More Pages: Chester Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25


To expensive

Preschool Book

Lots of info, but mostly for European practitioners

A tale of a hostess and a house party - not very romantic.This story is primarily the tale of a house party and all of the responsibilities required of a hostess. From that angle, it is quite interesting. What do you do when one of the guests brings along her three pug dogs who proceed to annoy and destroy wherever they go? A sister-in-law whose demanding requests and thoughtlessness cause trouble for the guests and servants alike? An older gentleman who importunes the housemaids? An aunt who reminds Chastity at every turn that she is nearly past her last prayers? A temperamental chef who threatens to quit if his talents are not properly appreciated?
But alas, what this book is NOT is a romance. At no time does Chastity say or even think that she is love with anyone. The romance at the end seems almost tacked onto the rest of the story as an afterthought. The explanation for Chastity's refusal of Jeffrey's proposals six years ago--that she was young and afraid of his passion--just doesn't ring true. Although I like the portrayal of the hero as a faithful admirer and a well-mannered gentleman (not a rake), he just didn't have the kind of appeal that one expects in a romance. I found myself preferring Chastity's brother, Lord Cummings, over him!
The heroine herself seems a bit cold and reserved for a romance novel. Her feelings toward the hero appear only a tad warmer than those toward another attentive guest, whose presence seems to be primarily for the purpose of making the hero jealous.
Not one of Ms. Buck's best efforts.
The not-so-polite side of Regency SocietyMs. Buck does very well at peopling the house party and the novel--the other brother and his catty wife; the widow who is after Lord Cummings; the widow's poor relation; the assorted friends and acquaintances. Unfortunately, this is to the detriment of the primary characters. We see much of Chastity, but Mr. Halston doesn't even show up until a quarter of the way into the novel. THE CHESTER CHARADE is not so much a romance as the story of one particular house party. In many ways--the lengthy converstations and gossip, the slow pace, the everyday details--this book reminds me of the works of Jane Austen. However, I do not care for any of the characters (except for the poor relation). Their sniping insults, rudeness, and dislike of each other made me set the volume aside many times, finally for good after Chapter 7. For readers who wish to see the not-so-polite side of Regency society, THE CHESTER CHARADE is a good choice. Other readers, however, might wish to try Ms. Buck's FREDERICKA'S FOLLY or TEMPTING SARAH instead, or one of Signet's other regencies.
Kimberly Borrowdale
pleasant but flawed

not very interestingHartman spends little more than a page on San Francisco's public transit woes. He ignores the development of BART - which operates almost exclusively as a conduit for suburban workers to go to and from the financial district and serves virtually none of San Francisco's neighborhoods. He also offers little insight into the city's homeless problem - people are drawn to San Francisco because it is the only city in the area that pash cash to homeless people.
I was most disappointed that after Hartman spent 385 pages outlining how the city's business establishment had virtually controlled urban redevelopment for the last 30 years - he spends the last 15 pages trying to blame San Francisco's gentrification problems on computer programmers in their mid-20s. This book was written so recently and yet Hartman's analysis is already incorrect - silicon valley people in their mid-20s are no longer a threat to San Francisco - but the business interests downtown and in Pacific Heights who obviously created the mess still have the same control over the city's affairs.


it reads like a gossip column.

Dearborn Plows

A Waste of Good Paper
